Monday, June 23, 2008

The Census and Privacy

Many people concerned about their privacy with public records today have no idea just how much a historian can uncover about people walking the planet not that long ago. The federal census is one tool we house historians use to reveal interesting tidbits about those owners, and even the renters or lodgers in your house long ago. The last available in detail for researchers in the 1930 census. (The 1940 census won't be released in detail until 2012, 72 years or an average life span after it was recorded)

The 1930 census includes the more detailed information than any other prior census. It was taken live by enumerators traveling door to door, as seen at left. It listed all the people in the household at that time; the head of household was listed first, followed by everyone in the house as they related to him or her: wife, husband, children, son-in-laws, etc. It listed everyone's age, where they were born, and even where both of their parents were born. If they were foreign born, it indicates when they arrived in the US, became a citizen, or were naturalized.

It also listed anyone unrelated in the house that lived there as lodgers (typically renting without meals) or as boarders, who took meals with the family. The census also listed occupation, along with employer or type of job: janitor, for example, within the public schools. For couples, it listed how many children had been born, and how many were alive in 1930.

Another interesting aspect of the 1930 census was the fact that unlike prior census, it recorded what the home owner thought their house was worth (a year after the stock market crash), or what they were paying in rent. Washington, DC homeowners might be shocked how little their house was worth that year, or that you could rent a nice townhouse in DC for about $35 a month that year.

Census enumerators also recorded race, although they frequently made errors because it was a guess by observation, rather than a question of the subject. Census enumerators that year were instructed: “to be particularly careful in reporting the class mulatto. The word is generic, and includes quadroons, octoroons, and all persons having any perceptible trace of African blood.” Importantly, it was up the census taker to observe and determine race, not the subject being interviewed, often resulting in a multitude of errors. Anyone of the Asian race were classified as white, while those born in India might have been classified as mulatto.

Only a person's age was recorded in the 1930 census, so you can only guess at what exact year they might have been born, depending on their birthday. Many people were unaware of their age, especially those who were formerly enslaved. Only the 1900 census included both month and date of birth, which is usually used to aid later census research.

Compared from year to year (taken every ten years), the census can track racial and social changes in a neighborhood or within a single house or apartment building. Most of the 1890 census, however, was destroyed in a 1921 fire in the Commerce Building where it was being stored. And in Washington, DC, enumerators only began using a house address with the 1880 census; you'll have to know the person's name to look up humans prior to that date.


Mari said...

I once found a Asian American fellow living with a Black family in my studies, listed as white. He was born in China and had a Chinese last name.
There was also the case of Luck C. Young in 1930 who was living with his white wife on New Jersey Ave NW, listed as white. However by the 2nd World War he was Black! And a widow. He remained black as far as I can tell until his death in the 60s.

HouseHistoryMan said...

I've run across several similar examples with changing skin color...and especially age when it comes to females...somehow between 1910 and 1920, they only aged 5 years...